Jagdish Singh Khehar
Jagdish Singh Khehar
|44th Chief Justice of India|
4 January 2017 – 27 August 2017
|Appointed by||Pranab Mukherjee|
|Preceded by||T. S. Thakur|
|Succeeded by||Dipak Misra|
|Judge of the Supreme Court of India|
13 September 2011 – 3 January 2017
|Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court|
8 August 2010 – 12 September 2011
|Preceded by||P. D. Dinakaran|
|Succeeded by||Vikramajit Sen|
|7th Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court|
29 November 2009 – 7 August 2010
|Preceded by||Tarun Agarwala (acting)|
|Succeeded by||Barin Ghosh|
|Born||28 August 1952|
Nairobi, British Kenya, now Nairobi, Kenya
|Nationality||Indian (1965-present); Kenyan (1963-1965); British (1952-1963)|
|Alma mater||Panjab University, Chandigarh|
Jagdish Singh Khehar (born 28 August 1952) is a senior advocate who was the 44th Chief Justice of India (CJI). Khehar is the first CJI from the Sikh community. He has been a judge in Supreme Court of India from 13 September 2011 to 27 August 2017 upon superannuation. He served for a brief period but gave many landmark Judgements such as the Triple Talaq and the Right to Privacy verdict. He was succeeded by Justice Dipak Misra.
This section needs additional citations for verification. (July 2021)
Justice J.S. Khehar led the five-judge Constitution Bench in Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association v. Union of India [2016(5) SCC 1]. By enabling the collegium system to continue, Justice J. S. Khehar, quashed the NJAC Act and also declared 99th Amendment to the Constitution unconstitutional. The majority concluded this judgment:
While adjudicating upon the merits of the submissions advanced at the hands of the learned counsel for the rival parties, I have arrived at the conclusion, that clauses (a) and (b) of Article 124A(1) do not provide an adequate representation, to the judicial component in the NJAC, clauses (a) and (b) of Article 124A(1) are insufficient to preserve the primacy of the judiciary, in the matter of selection and appointment of Judges, to the higher judiciary (as also transfer of Chief Justices and Judges, from one High Court to another). The same are accordingly, violative of the principle of "independence of the judiciary." Justice Khehar further explained:
that clause (c) of Article 124 A (1) is ultra-vires the provisions of the Constitution, because of the inclusion of the Union Minister in charge of Law and Justice as an ex officio Member of the NJAC. Clause (c) of Article 124A (1), in my view, impinges upon the principles of "independence of the judiciary", as well as, "separation of powers". It has also been concluded by me, that clause (d) of Article 124A (1) which provides for the inclusion of two "eminent persons" as Members of the NJAC is ultra vires the provisions of the Constitution, for a variety of reasons. The same has also been held as violative of the "basic structure" of the Constitution.
But fascinatingly, Justice Khehar admitted that all is not well even with the collegium system and this is the time to improve it. However, the Supreme Court invited the government to help the judiciary to improve and better the existing collegium system.
- A three judges Bench of the Supreme Court headed by Justice J S Khehar upheld cancellation of admission of more than 300 candidates
Justice J. S. Khehar also headed a historic five judge Constitution bench in Nabam Rebia & Bamand Felix v. Bamang Felix Deputy Speaker & Others, [2016(8) SCC 1] that reinstated the Congress-led Arunachal Pradesh Government and held all the actions of the Governor violative of the Constitution. Alluding S. R. Bommai v. Union of India [(1994)3 SCC 1] Justice Khehar avowed that it had: "all the powers to put the clock back".
The Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice J S Khehar imposed an exemplary cost of Rs. 25 lakh on NGO Suraz India Trust for filing 64 frivolous cases in various high courts and also in the apex court and wasting the judicial time. (Decided on 1 May 2017).
Justice J S Khehar in State of Punjab vs. Jagjit Singh (Decided on 26 October 2016) gave a significant verdict holding that the principal of 'equal pay for equal work' has to be made applicable to those engaged as daily wagers, casual and contractual employees who perform the same duties as the regulars.
Heading a three-judge bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court Justice Khehar decided a case involving definition of a Sikh. He held that religion must be perceived as it is, and not as another would like it to be.
Right to Privacy verdict
Right to Privacy verdict officially known as Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India, in which a nine-judge bench including Justice Khehar held that the right to privacy is protected as a fundamental right under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
2G spectrum case
As an aftermath of Supreme Court's landmark decision in the 2G spectrum case, Govt of India filed a Presidential reference before the Supreme Court. Justice Khehar gave a separate concurring opinion in which he warned that the government should not be under erroneous impression that it is not necessary to allocate natural resources through auction.
No part of the natural resource can be dissipated as a matter of largess, charity, donation or endowment, for private exploitation. Each bit of natural resource expended must bring back a reciprocal consideration.
Triple talaq case
Justice Khehar was one of the judges on multi-faith bench that heard the controversial Triple Talaq case in 2017. Though Khehar upheld the practice of validity of Triple Talaq (Talaq-e-Biddat), it was barred by the bench by 3:2 majority and asked the Central government to bring legislation in six months to govern marriage and divorce in the Muslim community. The court said till the government formulates a law regarding triple talaq, there would be an injunction on husbands pronouncing triple talaq on their wives.
Discover more about Notable judgements related topics
In 2017, the Committee on Judicial Accountability published the suicide note written by former Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister, Kalikho Pul. In the note, Pul claimed that Khehar had demanded ₹49 crore (Para 15.22, Page 39) and ₹31 crore (Para 15.27, Page 41) in bribes from Pul for delivering a favourable verdict. The Committee on Judicial Accountability has demanded a probe in the matter.
Source: "Jagdish Singh Khehar", Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, (2022, November 25th), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jagdish_Singh_Khehar.
Get our FREE extension now!
Supreme Court of India
Uttarakhand High Court
Y. V. Chandrachud
Hans Raj Khanna
List of chief justices of India
Rohinton Fali Nariman
Uday Umesh Lalit
National Judicial Appointments Commission
S. Abdul Nazeer
Triple talaq in India
Right to Privacy verdict
Ninety-ninth Amendment of the Constitution of India
- "Jagdish Singh Khehar - Profile". 2018 Privacy Conference. Retrieved 11 May 2020.
- "Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar - Profile". Supreme Court of India. Archived from the original on 13 November 2012. Retrieved 27 September 2012.
- "J S Khehar may become 1st Sikh Chief Justice of India in 2017". Day & Night News. 1 September 2011. Archived from the original on 21 May 2014.
- "Chief Justice J.S. Khehar ends his eventful tenure with a bang".
- "Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar had defined who is a Sikh". The Times of India.
- "Justice J.S. Khehar appointed as 44th Chief Justice of India". The Hindu. 19 December 2016. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
- "Justice Khehar had defined Sikh identity". The Times of India. 12 September 2011. Retrieved 20 December 2016.
- Bhandari, Vrinda; Kak, Amba; Parsheera, Smriti; Rahman, Faiza. "An Analysis of Puttaswamy: The Supreme Court's Privacy Verdict". IndraStra Global. 003: 004. ISSN 2381-3652.
- "Natural resources cannot be dissipated as charity: SC judge". First Post. 27 September 2012. Retrieved 25 March 2013.
- "Triple talaq case: Muslim judge on multi-faith bench kept mum all through". The Times of India.
- "5 Judges Of 5 Faiths Give Verdict On Triple Talaq".
- "Triple talaq verdict has not gone the entire distance".
- "Supreme Court declares triple talaq unconstitutional, strikes it down by 3:2 majority". The Times of India.
- "Five Supreme Court judges who passed the verdict on triple talaq".
- "Injunction on husbands pronouncing triple talaq until law is made: SC advocate".
- "This Is What Supreme Court Said In Triple Talaq Judgment [Read Judgment]". 22 August 2017.
- "Former CM Kalikho Pul's suicide note" (PDF).
- "CJAR covering note along with Mr. Kalikho Pul, former Arunachal Pradesh CM's complete suicide note (without redactions) – Campaign for Judicial Accountability & Judicial Reforms". judicialreforms.org. Retrieved 21 February 2017.
- 1952 births
- 20th-century Indian judges
- 21st-century Indian judges
- AC with 0 elements
- All Wikipedia articles written in Indian English
- All articles needing additional references
- Articles needing additional references from July 2021
- Articles with short description
- Chief Justices of India
- Chief Justices of the Karnataka High Court
- Chief Justices of the Uttarakhand High Court
- Indian Sikhs
- Judges of the Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Living people
- Panjab University alumni
- Short description matches Wikidata
- Use Indian English from September 2017
- Use dmy dates from September 2017
The content of this page is based on the Wikipedia article written by contributors..
The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Licence & the media files are available under their respective licenses; additional terms may apply.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization & is not affiliated to WikiZ.com.